Mirror boxes and mirror mounts
for photophysics beamline
B
N Raja Sekhar, S Padmanabhan, Aparna Shastry, P Meenakshi Raja Rao,
A S Raja Rao* and N C Das
Spectroscopy Division, BARC,
Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India
*Centre for Advanced Technology, Indore, India 452 013
1.
Introduction:
One of the beamlines
commissioned recently by Spectroscopy Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre,
Mumbai i.e. Photophysics (1) beamline, makes use of a toroidal mirror to focus
synchrotron light (40 mrad (H) X 6 mrad (V)) from Indus-1 on to the entrance
slit of a one meter Seya- Namioka monochromator. The monchromatic light coming
out of the exit slit of the monochromator is focussed at a distance of one
meter to illuminate a sample under study with the help of a second toroidal
mirror. For connecting the beamline to the Indus-1 SRS, to protect the surface
of the optical components used in the beamline and to transmit the Synchrotron
light of energy in 6-30eV at the sample, an ultimate pressure of 10-9
mbar has to be maintained in the beamline. Installation of the beamline,
steering of synchrotron light on to the sample and maximization of the flux at
the sample position require precise and reproducible rotational and
transnational movements of the mirrors about X, Y and Z axes under ultra high
vacuum conditions. Various details of design, fabrication and testing of the
mirror mounts required for achieving the above objectives and mirror chambers
to hold the mirror mounts containing the mirrors are described in this
article.
2. Description:
2.1. Design considerations
for mirror mounts:
- Independent rotational and
transnational motions in three mutually perpendicular directions (X,Y and Z)
without disturbing prevailing UHV conditions in the beamline.
- Translational and
rotational movements accuracies of the order of 1
± 0.1 mm and 1
±
0.2 mrad respectively.
If the
specified design considerations for the movements are not followed, the image
at the sample can shift by a minimum of 0.3 mm from the mean position
resulting in a loss of flux of the order of 25%.
2.2.Design considerations
for the Mirror boxes:
The mirror
boxes need several ports not only for connecting them to the beamline but also
to house mirror mounts, pressure gauges, pumping ports, beam viewers etc.
Keeping all these things in mind as many as twelve openings with different
sizes of conflat type flange connections are provided with.
3.Design Details and
fabrication
Based on the
design details described earlier and guidelines from the beamlines of the
UVSOR, Japan (2), two mirror chambers and mirror mounts were designed and
fabricated. Fig 1 and Fig.2 show photographs of a mirror box and a mirror
mount. In a typical mirror mount, the mirror is enclosed in a frame provided
with adjustable screws on the top and side directions. This arrangement
facilitates the rotation of the mirror around an axis perpendicular to the
plane of the mirror. The mirror frame is mounted on a copper block having an
angle equal to the mirror tilt. The mirror frame has an arrangement for
locating the mirror accurately by using fine pitch positioning screws. Two
pivot joints provided on the frame to impart the rotation necessary for angle
correction. The rotation of the mirror is controlled from outside by a
bellows-sealed mechanism using a micrometer head and a spring-loaded plunger.
The tube, which imparts this rotation also, acts as a carrier for coolant to
the mirror frame. Using three long bellows sealed shafts located in a
right-angled triangular geometry provides multiplane adjustment of the mirror.
The mirror mount is welded to a 203CF type of flange. Mirror chambers are
provided with twelve ports of different sizes of CF flanges.

Fig.1. Photograph of a mirror Box

Fig.2. Photograph of a mirror
mount
SS304L is
used for fabrication of the most components of the mirror mounts and mirror
boxes. The bellows and coolant channel used are made of SS316. The supporting
block of the mirror holder is made of copper for better thermal conductivity.
The chambers and mounts are TIG welded from inside, cleaned, electro-polished
and degassed in a vacuum furnace at a temperature of 8000 C for
eight hours to reduce the time that can take for achieving ultimate vacuum.
4. Testing:
After
degassing the mirror mounts are connected to the mirror boxes and were tested
for ultimate vacuum. This was performed with the help of turbomolecular and
sputter ion pumps. For achieving this, the chambers and mounts were baked to
a temperature of 2500 C after leak testing for leaks of the order
of 10-10 Std.cc/s. To estimate the constituents of the residual
gases, mass spectra were recorded with the help of a quadruple mass
spectrometer. Fig.3. shows one such residual gas spectrum. Subsequently
reproducibility and minimum attainable transnational and rotational
displacements under UHV conditions possible with the help of mirror mounts are
tested. These tests are:

performed using He-Ne laser
source and measuring the image displacement.
Fig.3. Residual gas spectrum at Ultimate pressure
corresponding to minimum
rotational /transnational displacements. The results obtained i.e. minimum
rotation being 0.00330 and corresponding an image displacement of
75m,
for both mirror mounts are good and are less than the minimum slit sizes of
100m
for the Seya-Namioka monochromator under use.
At present
these mirror boxes and mounts are part of the photophysics beamline and their
performance is satisfactory in the operation and optimization of the beamline.
5. References:
1.
P.Meenakshi Raja
Rao, B.N. Raja Sekhar, N.C.Das, H.A.Khan, S.S.Bhattacharya, A.S.Raja
Rao and A.P.Roy, “Mirror chambers and mirror mounts for photophysics
beamline”, Sadhana Journal, India, Vol. 22, 1-10 (1997) and references
therein.